|Variable Component Type||Environmental Common|
|Theme||Outcomes (learn about themes)|
|Projects||SESMAD, Fiji fisheries|
|Question||How confident are you in your answer regarding the effectiveness of this governance system for this commons?|
|Select Options||1 Not very confident, 2 Somewhat confident, 3 Very confident, 4 Almost certain|
|Importance||This variable provides a measure of the coder's level of confidence in their coding of the impact of the governance system on the commons.|
"This variable refers to the confidence the coder has in coding the variable ECConditionEffect, which is a measure of the the effect of the governance system on the commons. We understand the estimate of confidence in this variable to be a measure of the coder's degree of certainty in the evidence they used to code ECConditionEffect. These should be based on the coder's evaluation of the likelihood of finding contradictory information. See Patt & Dessai (2005) for a discussion of similar estimates of uncertainty in the context of climate change communication. Not very confident: Evidence about the effect of the governance system on the commons is contradictory or very limited. Somewhat confident: some evidence is available and fairly consistent. Very confident: multiple reliable sources of evdience exist and support the same effect. Almost certain: many reliable sources of evidence exist and all point to the same effect."
|Case||Interaction Type||Component||Value Used||Explanation|
|Forests in Indonesia||Governance||Forests in Indonesia||Almost certain (4)||This is based on a consensus of our sources|
|Forests in Indonesia||Governance||Forests in Indonesia||Not very confident (1)||There are conflicting accounts of both the condition changes of the resource during this period, as well as the impact of governance (as opposed to economic forces) on those changes. See Fleischman et al. (under review) for details. Given this uncertainty, we are not very confident in our estimates.|
|Seaflower MPA||Governance||Seaflower groupers||Very confident (3)||Based on the actual report.|
|Montreal Protocol||Biophysical||Ozone Depleting Substances||Almost certain (4)||ODS production is monitored regularly and we can be very confident that ODS production levels have fallen given monitoring data and the results observed indirectly in the ozone layer (lack of further deterioration than would be expected).|
|Galapagos Marine Reserve||Biophysical||Galapagos Sea Cucumber|
|Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ICCAT)||Governance||Western Atlantic Bluefin Tuna||Very confident (3)||Although uncertainty remains regarding the absolute size of stocks, we can assess relative performance with a reasonable degree of confidence given consistent estimation methods.|
|Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ICCAT)||Governance||Eastern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna||Very confident (3)|
|Community D (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community D Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Community G (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community G Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Montreal Protocol||Governance||Ozone Depleting Substances||Almost certain (4)|
|Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ICCAT)||Governance||Eastern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna||Very confident (3)|
|Montreal Protocol||Biophysical||Ozone||Almost certain (4)|
|Great Barrier Reef Marine Park||Governance||GBR coral cover||Very confident (3)|
|International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR)||Governance||Rhine Point source pollutants||Very confident (3)|
|Central California National Marine Sanctuaries||Governance||California Rocky Shores Ecosystem Health||Somewhat confident (2)||While broadly the rocky shores habitat is in good/fair condition and oil spills have been avoided largely, a number of diseases have declined ecosystem health in the last decade.|
|Great Barrier Reef Marine Park||Governance||GBR target fish|
|Montreal Protocol||Biophysical||Ozone||Very confident (3)|
|Montreal Protocol||Biophysical||Ozone Depleting Substances||Very confident (3)|
|Great Barrier Reef Marine Park||Governance||GBR target fish||Somewhat confident (2)|
|Montreal Protocol||Governance||Ozone Depleting Substances||Almost certain (4)||Although the absolute value of ODS emissions is not known, the general consensus is that ODS emissions increased over this time period.|
|Wakatobi National Park||Governance||Wakatobi fish spawning||Very confident (3)||Data is limited and some report stable populations (TNC) while others report a small improvement. http://www.reefresilience.org/case-studies/indonesia-mpa-management/ Subhan 2014 Interview confirmed a possible slight improvement in fish, but in light of a major decline before this snap shot|
|Community H (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community H Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Macquarie Island Marine Park||Governance||Patagonian Toothfish||Somewhat confident (2)|
|Macquarie Island Marine Park||Governance||Light Mantled Albatross||Very confident (3)|
|Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) Marine National Monument||Governance||NWHI Green Turtle||Almost certain (4)||Exploitation stopped in the 1970s and since then nesting abundance has been increasing linearly at approximately 5.7% (Balazs and Chaloupka 2004). It is estimated that Hawaiian Green Turtles are currently at 83% of their pre-exploitation numbers (Balazs and Chaloupka 2004)|
|Raja Ampat (National Act No. 32 2004)||Governance||Raja Ampat Green Turtle||Very confident (3)||NGO reports and monitoring indicate improvements and decline in poaching. Alternative meat (pigs) now available in some villages.|
|International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR)||Biophysical||Rhine Non-point source pollutants|
|Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR)||Governance||Galapagos Green Turtle||Very confident (3)||Reports indicate stability and Stuart Banks interview indicated turtle populations were stable|
|Macquarie Island Marine Park||Governance||Macquarie Island Royal Penguin||Very confident (3)||Although there is considerable uncertainty regarding the point estimate there appears to be a broad consensus that the population is stable.|
|Great Australian Bight Marine Park (GABMP) (Commonwealth Waters)||Governance||GABMP (Commonwealth Waters) Sea Lion||Very confident (3)|
|Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR)||Governance||Galapagos Sharks||Somewhat confident (2)||Overall decline in sharks is likely, although a solid trend is difficult to determine due to lack of population trend data. Reports of increases in reef sharks, probably isn't as significant as the declines in many other species such as hammerheads. Not enough data on the highly migratory species e.g. Mako or Blue sharks to make any inferences. Alex Hearn pers comm|
|Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) Marine National Monument||Governance||NWHI Trophic Density||Very confident (3)||based on numerous reports and studies|
|Wakatobi National Park||Governance||Wakatobi coral cover||Very confident (3)||Some reports with overal stable trend in coral, and supported by interview.|
|Community A (Fiji fisheries)||Governance||Community A Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Community E (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community E Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Community C (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community C Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Raja Ampat (National Act No. 32 2004)||Governance||Raja Ampat Coral Cover||Very confident (3)||numerous reports (WWF report?) and interview with M.Erdmann (~14yrs experience working in RA)|
|Community F (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community F Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Community B (Fiji Fisheries)||Governance||Community B Fish Resources||Very confident (3)|
|Raja Ampat (National Act No. 32 2004)||Governance||Raja Ampat Reef Fish||Very confident (3)||Interview with Mark Erdmann who has been workign in the are for ~14years. WWF monitoring report?|
|Central California National Marine Sanctuaries||Governance||California Groundfish Habitat||Very confident (3)|
|Great Australian Bight Marine Park (GABMP) (Commonwealth Waters)||Governance||GABMP (Commonwealth Waters) Southern Bluefin Tuna||Very confident (3)||the dramatic decline in the total population of Southern Bluefin Tuna to 7–15% of the 1960 parental biomass is well documented (FSC 2009)|
|Great Barrier Reef Marine Park||Governance||GBR coral cover||Very confident (3)||Monitoring of reef cover is quite good. See paper by De'ath et al http://www.pnas.org/content/109/44/17995.full|
|Central California National Marine Sanctuaries||Governance||California Humpback Whale||Almost certain (4)||Almost certain because some uncertainty regarding rather it was the Sanctuary management plan, or other external measures which have led to this increasing population.|
|Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) Marine National Monument||Governance||NWHI Lobster Fishery||Very confident (3)||Numerous reports indicate no increase in populations, although these are ancedotal they are from scientists studying the benthos where lobster would be frequented. Despite continual monitoring by NOAA there appear no population estimates since the closure of the fishery|
|Great Australian Bight Marine Park (GABMP) (Commonwealth Waters)||Governance||GABMP (Commonwealth Waters) Southern Right Whale||Very confident (3)|
|Heard and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve||Governance||Light Mantled Albatross||Somewhat confident (2)||The lack of data makes it impossible to be confident, but the evidence that is available suggests the population is stable or increasing (between 10-100 light-mantled sooty albatross were frequently spotted by tourists in 2012).|
|Svalbard Nature Reserves||Governance||Svalbard Shrimp||Somewhat confident (2)||The biomass index indicates that the system has improved from the beginning to the end. However, it fluctuated considerably within this time period, and has fluctuated even more in the past.|
|Svalbard Nature Reserves||Governance||Svalbard Kittiwake||Almost certain (4)||Good annual monitoring. Although this trend is averaged over the whole area, some sites and increased, whereas others have decreased.|
|Falkland Islands squid||Governance||Patagonian squid (Loligo gahi)||Very confident (3)|
|Great Barrier Reef Marine Park||Governance||GBR Green Turtle||Almost certain (4)||Confidence of data in Outlook report 2014 for turtles is considered: Adequate high-quality evidence and high level of consensus. Within the GBR there has been monitoring of turtles for 25+ years (Limpus et al 2003). Information is based on nesting numbers and is highly variable between years. To date, there have been no detectable declines in the number of nesting green turtles at Great Barrier Reef nest monitoring sites. However, the 20 to 25 years of data for the key sites (Raine Island, Heron Island) do not cover a single generation for green turtles, and trends are difficult to determine with the large fluctuations in nesting numbers that can occur because of the El Niño Southern Oscillation.|
|Cenderwasih National Park||Governance||Cenderwasih coral cover||Very confident (3)||Fairly confident in response and hard coral cover is often mentioned to be high. WWF 2015 report for BHS suggests no signifcant changes across the region.|
|Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR)||Governance||Galapagos Sea Cucumber||Almost certain (4)||Many reports document the decline in the fishery, e.g. see catch data in Galapagos Report 2011-2012 (Galapagos Conservancy) http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/180373/0|
|Seaflower MPA||Governance||Seaflower coral reefs||Very confident (3)||Coral cover estimates are based on repeated monitoring surveys.|
|Wakatobi National Park||Governance||Wakatobi Green Turtle||Somewhat confident (2)||information from reports/interviews - very little data on turtles and no results from long-term monitoring for firm conclusions. Only 100 nests/season. http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/asiaandthepacific/indonesia/explore/safe-haven-for-turtles.xml|
|Heard and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve||Governance||King Penguin||Somewhat confident (2)||See above.|
|Svalbard Nature Reserves||Governance||Svalbard Polar Bear||Very confident (3)||There are few published studies on the polar bear population, and the language in the recent monitoring report reflects this high degree of uncertainty (MOSJ 2013c [Online]).|
|Cenderwasih National Park||Governance||Cenderwasih target fish||Somewhat confident (2)||Despite involvement of NGOs there is little monitoring data available. A recent status report (2015) on the Birds Head MPAs does not include time series data for Cenderawasih. An interview with Erdmann said slight improvements, and for the BHS trends appear stable so coded as no change rather than an increase due to lack of data to confirm increasing trend.|
|New Zealand squid||Governance||Arrow Squid (Nototodarus spp.)||Somewhat confident (2)|
|California squid||Governance||California market squid (Loligo opalescens)||Very confident (3)|
|Heard and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve||Governance||Patagonian Toothfish||Very confident (3)||My answer is based directly on the annual CCAMLR fishery report for toothfish at HIMI, which reports the spawning stock biomass trend since the beginning of the fishery.|
|Pond aquaculture on Lombok, Indonesia||Governance||Lombok aquaculture irrigation canals||Somewhat confident (2)|
|Pond aquaculture on Lombok, Indonesia||Governance||Lombok aquaculture irrigation canals|
|Caete-Teperacu Extractive Reserve (RESEX) in Braganca, Brazil||Governance||Mangrove forest in Bragança, Brazil||Missing|
|Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica fisheries governance||Governance||Gulf of Nicoya fisheries||Somewhat confident (2)|
|Gili Trawangan Coastal Tourism||Governance||Coral reefs, coast and small-island on and surrounding Gili Trawangan, Indonesia||Somewhat confident (2)|
Basic:A basic variable describes essential and basic background information for a component.
Biophysical:Biophysical variables describe just that: important biophysical properties, largely of environmental commons, that are not captured by a more specific theme.
Causation:A variable with this theme describes issues of causality, which is a complex subject. Most basically this theme is associated with variables that describe different types of causation and different types of causes of environmental problems.
Context:contextual variable relates the component with which it associated to the social and/or ecological setting of a particular interaction and/or case.
Ecosystem services:Variables associated with this theme describe factors that affect or describe the provision of important ecosystem services by a natural resource.
Enforcement:Enforcement involves several different processes, including monitoring for violations of rules, sanctioning violators, and conflict resolution mechanisms involved in this process. Variables that relate to any of these processes should be attached to this theme.
External:Variables with this theme relate a component to processes external to the case with which the component is associated.
Heterogeneity:Variables with this theme describe important ways in which the member of an actor group differ from each other.
Incentives: This theme is associated with variables that are not directly related to institutions and rules, but which still play a role in affecting the incentives that commons users have to ameliorate or exacerbate the commons they use.
Institutional-biophysical linkage:This is a sub-theme of the institutions theme, and describes those variables that ask about the relationship between a set of institutions and a biophysical aspect of a commons.
Institutions:Variables with this theme describe the social institutions (rules, property rights) that are used to organize and direct human behavior. It does not include monitoring and enforcement of these institutions, as these are associated with the Enforcement theme.
Knowledge and uncertainty:Variables with this theme describe levels of knowledge that actor groups have regarding a commons, as well as factors that affect how much uncertainty there is in the status and dynamics of that commons.
Leadership:Leaders play an important role in commons management, most traditionally by providing for public goods needed to organize commons users. But there are other possible roles, and variables associated with this theme can relate to any role that a leader might play in an interaction.
Outcomes:This theme is attached to variables that deal with any outcomes that are produced by the actions of relevant actors in an interaction.
Resource renewability:Variables associated with this theme deal with the ability of a natural resource to be highly productive and renewable.
Social capital:Social capital captures the processes that enable the members of an actor group to work effectively together. Variables associated with this theme describe factors that affect or in some way express the level of social capital among members of a group.
Spatial:Variables associated with the Spatial theme describe important spatial patterns or dynamics, such as the spatial heterogeneity of a commons, or whether or not a user group resides within a particular commons.
Technology:This theme is attached to variables that consider the role that technology and infrastructure have in affecting commons outcomes.