| Summary | Farmers and farming companies located within the Rhine's watershed and main source of some non-point source pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorous |
|---|
| Project | SESMAD |
|---|
| Subtype | Local Resource User Group |
|---|
| Sector | Fresh Water Pollution |
|---|
| Interest Heterogeneity | Low (1) |
|---|
| Explanation | The relatively high dependence on fertilizer and pesticides is homogeneous across agricultural activities |
|---|
| Costs Of Exit | Yes |
|---|
| Explanation | Many farmers and farming corporations make important capital investments that need to be recovered. |
|---|
| Proportionality (Of Costs And Benefits) | No |
|---|
| Explanation | There is no apparent benefit for farmers to abate pollution; rather costs |
|---|
| Actor Group Coordination | Both formal and informal |
|---|
| Explanation | The agricultural sector in Europe is very well organized, in the form of both unions and cooperatives; however this organization is for purposes other than pollution abatement |
|---|
| Leadership | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|
| Leadership Accountability | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|
| Leadership Authority | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|
| Actor Group Trust | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|
| Past Collaboration | High (3) |
|---|
| Explanation | The agricultural lobby at the European level is generally well known for its cohesiveness and effectiveness . |
|---|
| Personal Communication | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|
| Remote Communication | |
|---|
| Explanation | |
|---|